1.4 Revisiting Irrational Numbers
NCERT Class 10 Mathematics for Blind Students made Screen Readable by Professor T K Bansal.
In Class 9, you were introduced to irrational numbers and many of their properties. You studied about their existence and how the rationals and the irrationals together made up the real numbers. You even studied how to locate irrationals on the number line. However, we did not prove that they were irrationals. In this section, we will prove that √2, √3, √5 and, in general, √p is irrational, where p is a prime number. One of the theorems, we use in our proof, is the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic.
Recall, a number‘s’ is called irrational if it cannot be written in the form p/q, where p and q are integers and q ≠ 0. Some examples of irrational numbers, with which you are already familiar, are:
√2, √3, √15, π, − √2/√ 3, 0.10110111011110 ... etc.
Before we prove that √ 2 is irrational, we need the following theorem, whose proof is based on the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic.
Theorem 1.3:
Let p be a prime number. If p divides α^2, then p divides α, where α is a positive integer.
*Proof: Let the prime factorization of α be as follows: [*Not from the examination point of view.]
α = p1 × p2 × . . × pn , where p1, p2, . . ., pare primes, not necessarily distinct.
Therefore, α^2 = (p1 × p2 . . . × pn) (p1 × p2 . . . × pn) = p1^2 × p2^2 ×. . . × pn^2.
Now, we are given that p divides α^2. Therefore, from the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, it follows that p is one of the prime factors of α^2. However, using the uniqueness part of the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, we realise that the only prime factors of α^2 are p1, p2, . . ., pn. So p is one of p1, p2, . . ., pn.
Now, since α = p1 × p2 ×. . . × pn, p divides α.
We are now ready to give a proof that √2 is irrational.
The proof is based on a technique called ‘proof by contradiction’. (This technique is discussed in some detail in Appendix 1).
Theorem 1.4:
√2 is irrational.
Proof:
Let us assume, to the contrary, that √ 2 is rational. So, we can find integers r and s (≠ 0) such that √2 = r/s.
Suppose r and s have a common factor other than 1. Then, we divide by the common factor to get
√2 = α/ β, where α and β are co-prime.
So, β√ 2 = α. Squaring on both sides and rearranging, we get 2β^2 = α^2. Therefore, 2 divides α^2.
Now, by Theorem 1.3, it follows that 2 divides α.
So, we can write α = 2c for some integer c.
Substituting for α, we get 2 β^2 = 4c^2, that is, β^2 = 2c^2.
This means that 2 divides β^2, and so 2 divides β (again using Theorem 1.3 with p = 2).
Therefore, α and β have at least 2 as a common factor.
But this contradicts the fact that α and β have no common factors other than 1.
This contradiction has arisen because of our incorrect assumption that √2 is rational.
So, we conclude that √ 2 is irrational.
Example 9
Prove that √ 3 is irrational.
Solution:
Let us assume, to the contrary, that √ 3 is rational.
That is, we can find integers a and b (≠ 0) such that √ 3 = a/b
Suppose a and b have a common factor other than 1, then we can divide by the common factor, and assume that a and b are co-prime.
So, b √ 3 =a
Squaring on both sides, and rearranging, we get 3b^2 = a^2.
Therefore, a^2 is divisible by 3, and by Theorem 1.3, it follows that a is also divisible by 3.
So, we can write a = 3c for some integer c.
Substituting for a, we get 3b^2 = 9c^2, that is, b^2 = 3c^2.
This means that b^2 is divisible by 3, and so b is also divisible by 3 (using Theorem 1.3 with p = 3).
Therefore, a and b have at least 3 as a common factor.
But this contradicts the fact that a and b are co-prime.
This contradiction has arisen because of our incorrect assumption that √ 3 is rational.
So, we conclude that √ 3 is irrational.
In Class 9, we mentioned that:
• the sum or difference of a rational and an irrational number is irrational and
• the product and quotient of a non-zero rational and irrational number is irrational.
We prove some particular cases here.
Example 10
Show that 5 − √3 is irrational.
Solution:
Let us assume, to the contrary, that 5 − √3 is rational.
That is, we can find co-prime a and b (b ≠ 0) such that 5− √3 = a/b
Therefore, 5 − a/b = √ 3.
Rearranging this equation, we get √ 3 = 5 − a/b = (5b − a)/b Since a and b are integers, we get 5 − a/b is rational, and so √3 is rational.
But this contradicts the fact that √3 is irrational.
This contradiction has arisen because of our incorrect assumption that 5 − √3 is rational.
So, we conclude that 5 − √3 is irrational.
Example 11
Show that 3 √2 is irrational.
Solution:
Let us assume, to the contrary, that 3 √2 is rational. That is, we can find co-prime a and b (b ≠ 0) such that 3 √2= a/b
Rearranging, we get √2 = a/3b Since 3, a and b are integers, a/3b is rational, and so √ 2 is rational.
But this contradicts the fact that √2 is irrational.
So, we conclude that 3 √2 is irrational.
EXERCISE 1.3
Q1. Prove that √ 5 is irrational.
Q2. Prove that 3 + 2 √5 is irrational.
Q3. Prove that the following are irrationals:
(i) 1/ √2
(ii) 7 √5
(iii) 6 + √2